Eric's+World

Timeline on Sunpyo's Wiki http://kisworldhistory.wikispaces.com/Sunpyo%27s+World

Eric Kwon Make a chart/venn diagram/organizer of some to illustrate the similarities and differences between these two conflicts.

10/10

[|Eric and Min Debate]

Class 48 HW - There were always tensions going on during the War; Stalin refused to join the League of Nations. - competition was very intense between the two after the war for other countries (different political beliefs) - Stalin mad at America and Britain for constantly stalling D-Day - 1918 when USA tried to destroy Russia's revolution; still shows hatred - U.S trying to protect Germany; Russia did not like Germany whatsosever

Incomplete 2/10

Class 47 HW

10/10

Class 46 record your thoughts on your gallery page, with a subheading for each video. Twins: Having to be a twin during the holocaust was an unlucky mishap. You were mistreated with many different experiments and I found this to be very wrong. Why should a human being be experimented forcefully by another human being? They have no rights to do so. Furthermore, the fact that the Nazis were doing painful and treacherous operations on the twins was heartbreaking to hear.

Two Brothers: During the Holocaust a family would be separated by their gender so this would mean a mom and daughter may never see their father and son ever again. In many cases this would be because they were killed in their camp. People were beaten at the camps without reason. When the two brothers were further separated throughout the camp it broke their hearts. When the two met they did not hug or kiss. The old brother stated that the camp tore out their ability to love, cry and laugh. It must have been terrible for the two.

Mordechai Eldar: Listening to Eldar, I realized how close everyone was to dying. They were under conditions like no others and would just collapse to the ground and dye. Also, when I heard that they were starved to death, I thought to myself, "why don't they just kill them?" Hearing these conditions that Eldar went through made me think death was better to go through than the pain they had to endure the whole time.

Zanne Farbstein: When I heard of the gruesome scenes of children being thrown into fire to be left to burn alive it really showed me how bad the camps were. It told me that they were treated like animals, maybe even worse. Wondering if you were even going to be living the next day is always a fear and its not one that you want to ever experience.

Yaakov Hollander: The move to camp to camp (12 camps) must have been a very long journey. Never knowing when you'll be free or when it will all stop was probably even harder. Coming out liberated and weighing only 33 kilos as a grown man is a situation all of us does not want to be in or even see.

Sophie Engelsman: Sophie's story was very similar to Hollander's. They both moved to many different camps and Sophie ended up weighing 88 pounds when she was liberated. However, when she was liberated she didn't feel like she was. It explains how horrific the camp. It made me feel hatred towards Hitler even more because he changed the lives of the Jewish people completely even after they were freed. But, it seemed as Sophie found her way in life as a midwife and seems to be a lot happier with her new life.

Eva Brown: Having to have a secret burden in your life that you have to keep in your life because you don't want to upset them must be a very hard thing to do. Brown thought the war was over, but the real trouble was just about to start for her. She was given a number as her identity and lost her old one. I'm happy for her because she found a love and partner for her life.

10/10

Class 45 10/10

Class 44

10/10

Class 43 short paragraph on you gallery page giving your opinion on the fairness or unfairness of Japanese internment.

What wartime images do you recognize from your study of the war?
The uniform the German army was wearing was the same in this video. Furthermore, the nazi (swastika) sign was used many times throughout this video. Also, I see the German industrialization making lots of weapons for the war.

What are some of the messages of this cartoon?
This cartoon shows the trouble Hitler and Germany brought to the world. They industrialized all these weapons so that they could become powerful in the world. Also, it showed that German people were in hard times. Hitler was in absolute control and did not give his people freedom.

Why do you think companies like Disney and Warner Brothers produced these cartoons during the war?
Companies like Disney and Warner Brothers produced these cartoons during the war to show the violence and cruelty of the war in a non violent way. Also, since the audience range is very high between the two companies the message comes out more quickly to the public.

What is in the cartoon? Explain the symbolism you see.

 * can't access the picture on any browser

What is the intended message of the cartoon?

 * can't access the picture on any browser

=
3. Life on the Home front in Britain exploration... Go to [|this site] and click on each topic area to learn about life in Britain during the war. For each of the following topics, write down 3 significant pieces of information. You may do this on your gallery page, or as a hard copy. ======

Children at war
- 3.5 million children put to safety - children separated from family - children thought they were leaving their homes for a holiday and were happy

Rationing
- Food rationing limited the food to a very low amount - clothes were rationed to - families could only buy food by registering to a food store

Women at war
- Factories were short of workers so they recruited women to take the place of men - wereAir Raid Wardens to patrol streets - Women's Voluntary Service and millions of women joined

Messages of war
- propagandas to make people volunteer for jobs or services - propaganda to make men join the war cause - mixed views of propaganda on Hitler/Nazi

10/10

Class 42 I was able to finish 1/3 of the notes and reading.

[[image:kisworldhistory/Eric_Kwon_Japan's_Campaign_Guided_Reading.jpeg width="640" height="827"]]
Write a short description of the perspectives presented in the political cartoons below. What does each cartoon highlight about how Japanese expansion was viewed? A. Picture shows the LON pointing at Japan-China, but not being able to do anything. Then it shows the U.S beat up as if they did everything to stop the war. It proves that no one wanted for Japan to be attacking China, but the LON could not do anything, so they asked the U.S. B. This picture is showing that the U.S and Japan are living luxury life. They are the highest quality country and deserve the best, while other countries don't. C. This picture shows the burning of the League of Nations document. Japan will no longer be following them. D. These kangaroos represent Australia. This picture is displaying Australia as a strong nation, but it shows Japan as strong.

Why did Japan attack the United States of America? Provide evidence from the source below in your answer. Japan attacked the United States for several reasons. The main reason was that the U.S froze all of Japanese assets. U.S placed an embargo on the Japanese that removed all trading for them. Furthermore, Japan's oil stockpile was limited to two years because of the oil embargo. Japan was therefore forced to attacked the U.S.

Key Events of Pearl Harbor Attack: - Before: Japanese diplomats make plans to expand its nations to Washington D.C and to attack Pearl Harbor to take down U.S fleet. - During: Japan attacks Pearl Harbor and thousands of lives have been lost. It was a well devised surprise attack by Japan. - America joins the WW on the Allies and declare war on Japan.

10/10

Class 41
> 1) What was Operation Sea Lion? > Operation Sea Lion was a WWII plan made my Nazi Germany in which they were going to invade Britain in 1940. It was however moved to a later date and then canceled forever. > > > 2) Why did the battle not look good for Britain? > Britain's ally France was beaten by Germany so the Britain army was clearly outnumbered by the German armies. Also, Britain left most of its weapons back in the previous war. > > > 3) What advantage did Britain have? > Britain made one clear advantage. They had a radar to detect when enemy planes were coming near them. > > > 4) What was Germany's mistake? > The crucial mistake Germany made was bombing Berlin instead of fighting at the front. This caused resistance from Britain and made Hitler eventually give up. > > > 5) What was the impact of the bombing of London? How did the bombing of London aid Britain's cause? > The bombing of London caused countless deaths. The bombings done were made so that Britain would join London as an alliance thinking Germany was too strong. This just caused for Britain to make more airfields and RAF aircrafts. > > > 6) Why was the outcome of the battle of Britain significant for the Allies? > Winston Churchill's speech led to great nationalism within Britain. Furthermore, the invention of the radar within Britain. This ultimately led to the victory for Britain. This win was significant for the allies because it lead to greater hopes for the Allies. Also, the British were able to kill off smany of the soldiers from the Germans. Finally, it stalled Germany long enough for the allies to plan for te Germans. Britain's outcome against the Germans lead to greater results for the Allies later on. > Notes from podcast? 8/10

Class 40

10/10

Hitler’s Germany pg. 21-25 Notes

10/10


 * Notes Adolf Hitler Ch.1/2**

=10/10
===

Oral Quiz 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zciFrK7R_-s&feature=youtu.be

=
Islam could be used to manipulate people in KOREA? Are there a lot of Muslims here then? I also question your assumption that modern Fascism would not be cruel because of "enlightenment ideas", since the Fascism of the 1930s was also post-Enlightenment. Other than that, you've done a good job with this question. 9.5/10======

===

Oral Quiz 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_bZwNu6YJg&feature=youtu.be = = This is much better than the last quiz, Eric. 9.5/10

===

Read the "Chapter in Brief" section on "Postwar Uncertainty" and "A Worldwide Depression" and annotate focusing on the underlying problems in the US and world economy which CAUSED the Depression AND how different countries attempted to SOLVE the problems. Create an organizer for your information (digital or hard copy).

Look at this [|Photo Essay on the Great Depression], carefully reading the captions and examining the images. Talk about what you see as a group, then write 2 newspaper headlines, one from the // International Herald Tribune //, and one from the // New York Times // might run __ if these pictures were taken today __. Think about how headlines use strong, attention-getting words. Once you have your headlines, write the thesis statement and three paragraph topic sentences for each article (i.e. what's the main point, and what are 3 points that support that thesis).

// International Herald Tribune // Money Makes a Larger "Difference" // Thesis: As economic failure increases, the gap between the rich and poor grows larger and the poor is left baffled. // // 1. Many are left unemployed and on the streets // // 2. The people that were working were payed minimum wage and were forced to work very hard. // // 3. As the poor worked for the rich, the rich gained the most benefits and collected the money that they earned. //

//New York Times// Sudden Outbreaks //Thesis: The people are getting very unhappy with the current situation and can no longer take it.// //1. Strikes are starting to develop.// //2. Even kids were going on strike to show that they were being treated harshly in jobs.// //3. The blacks were treated unfairly. (was separated from the whites; theatre for colored people)//

Watch these short videos and take notes.

- lent money/stocks to poor people - constant rise of stock price - price payed for many stocks was in enduely out of proportion to the actually profitablity of the company that issued them (gave illusion of increased value): what went up went back down - Black Tuesday - Greatest stock decrease - Gap; Poor People <-> Rich People increased - Bank couldn't give people back money - 1/4 people unemployed 1/4 banks closed - “10 men could buy; 10 million could not find food to eat” - Franklin Roosevelt won election by a landside - First New Deal (1933-1937): 15 legislations in 100 days Start of development after the Great Depression - Second New Deal (1937-1941): Economic increase, America is starting to stabilize and many people are starting to be employed - Third New Deal (1941-1945): America is potentially coming out of the Great Depression WPA creates more jobs - F.D.I has war on U.S - Hitler comes to power because of the Great Depression - 10 billion dollars in stock gone - Britain and France could not go to war.
 * then**

[|29 Minute Overview]

[|A teacher's summary, with an international focus](no need to watch the summary) and this [|documentary] (you can start from 0:40 and watch to the end)

oral quiz 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ag_fRABqi1c

=
Many errors and misunderstandings. For example, Korea annexed Korea in 1910 -- before the FIRST World War, so this isn't part of the build-up to the Second World War. You seem to repeat what you have heard in class, but demonstrate little understanding of how facts for events fit together, which concerns me. It's not just about memorizing facts, Eric. 7.5/10======

===

**THE CHINESE REVOLUTION and JAPANESE IMPERIALISM**
> ===Station 1:===

The Versailles Treaty did not help China's problem whatsoever. China has big hopes in freeing themselves from foreign rule (Germany) to Japan. China had declared war on Germany previously in trying to get support from the Allies during WWI. However, instead of getting the freedom that they wanted so badly, what they got was a switch in ruler, Japan. This angered the Chinese and they started to protest. These Japanese people would later on come to China and try and take over.
 * Read "Imperial China Collapses" from the Chapters in Brief and answer #4 on your gallery page.

**Station 2:**
= Japan Influences Asia = With the emperor Mutsuhito Japan was starting to modernize their country by modeling themselves after the U.S and European countries. This would lead into a great into a great leap in industrialization and military power. Japan was now attempting be a world power in this new world. They had tried to take over Manchuria to show that it could compete with the best. This surprised the world because Japan had defeated a supposably stronger Russia in order to have control over Manchuria. Furthermore, Japan would then attack Korea the next year and had absolute control by 1910.
 * Look at this [|Website on Japan's 1931 invasion of China]. Read the Chapter in Brief on "Modernization in Japan", paying particular attention to Japan's invasion of Korea. Then read "A Justification of Japanese Expansionism". With these 3 sources, write a short chapter for a English-language history book to be used in Korean high schools about Japan's role in Asia in the first half of the 20th century. Decide what graphs, charts, maps or images (up to 3) you would want to include (these do not need to be "real" -- just describe what you'd like them to show, and come up with a title or caption for each)**.** Post on your gallery page.

China Takes a Hit
Japan was in pressure of having too many people in its country. Japan had three options to fix this: emigration, advance into world markets and finally expanding its territories. The first two options were not available though. Emigration was closed because the anti-Japanese immigration polices from other countries. Then, the second option was closed because of the tariff barriers and the abrogation of commercial treaties. Thus, Japan had to go with expanding its territory. So it chose Mutsuhito. But, this wasn't a typical rule; Japan would make Manchuria its own nation.
 * Map showing Manchuria separate from China* China is completely new nation and is now separate from China.

Korean Takes a Dramatic Shift
Japanese influence in Korea was great, but they were doing this in a negative way. Korean newspapers were banned and the once Korean schools were now turned into an all Japanese speaking school. Also, the Korean history was not being taught anymore as they were forced to only learn about Japan's history. In addition to this, Korean farmers were having their land taken away by Japanese settlers and other Koreans were not allowed to start new businesses. The Koreans were not content with any of this and began a nationalist movement again Japanese rule.
 * Picture showing Japanese settlement in Korea* (Japanese settlement in Korea has been resented by many Koreans.)

**Station 3:** Was Mao a better or worse national leader than Stalin? Answer on your gallery page. From Mao's actions it seemed in comparison with Stalin. Both of them killed millions of lives and did not care for a single one of them. However, Mao to me was a worse national leader than Stalin. I say this because in terms of nationalism, Mao has completely destroyed China's culture by burning books and attempting to delete China's history. Furthermore, Mao has even tried to give himself a good image to the world by hiding his true image. However, we now know what he has done to achieve his goals. To this day, many people in China worship Mao and think of him as a hero. To me, Mao was one of the worst leaders in history and is potentially worse or on par with Stalin.

10/10

Russian Revolution Oral QUIZ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9f5kn0wedrY&feature=youtu.be

You lose focus, and your presentation suffers. Timing and organization need to be improved so that you can tell the whole "story". 8/10

__**Station 1) Overview of Russian Revolution**__ The 1917 Revolution that Russia had was caused by serveral factors. The start of it was caused by Alexander III and his son, Nicholas II making bad decisions. When the people and soldiers wanted the war to stop, the czars kept on continuing the war. This caused both the people and soldiers to become angry. Additionally, the rapid industrial growth lead to poor working conditions, low wages and child labor. This lead to strikes and the government killed hundred of them and this just made the strikes spread even further, including the soldiers. Then, Lenin came along and came up with a motto (peace, land and bread) to ultimately start the revolution.
 * Class 31 **

**__Station 2) Primary and Secondary Sources: Video__** Now, upload a podcast on your gallery page in which you explain whether Stalin was a good guy or a bad guy, and why.  media type="file" key="Eric Kwon_Stalin Good or Bad?.mp3" width="240" height="20"

__**Station 3) Tools to Persuade and Motivate- Propaganda**__ __P ick one of the propaganda pieces from the website above and answer the following questions: __



1. What is the message that this poster is trying to get out to the Russian people? This poster is trying to reveal to us that the Leninism lets any race/nationality prosper and that they will conquest anyone that opposes. The poster is calling for unity within the country (Russia) under this new political theory. 2. Do you find this piece of propaganda to be compelling? Why or why not? I found this propaganda to be compelling because it shows the confidence in the faces of every nationality under Lenin. Furthermore, they are all seen as powerful in this propaganda and they seem to be following Leninism (holding the banner with Lenin), so it convinces us that all are strong and united under this new system.

3. Make your own propaganda poster designed to make viewers adopt your viewpoint on one of the following issues: school uniforms; freedom of speech; hagwons

=== Read pp 424-427, and the Visual Summary on p. 428, then answer Question #2 Evaluating Decisions on p. 428 and post your answer on your gallery. ===
 * 1) 2. How did the Treaty of Versailles reflect the different personalities and agendas of the men in power at the end of WWI?

During the Treaty of Versailles, several countries just wanted a small piece of land, while France wanted to completely destroy Germany. However, the United States of America did not want anything and Woodrow Wilson even brought up the idea of the League of Nations. The Treaty of Versailles brought up all of these personalities and agendas with how each country was involved with the war. Since France was the most affected from the war, they obviously wanted the most. Other countries that weren't as involved just wanted to get something out of the treaty and get out. Since the U.S did not want anything, it could have showed that they were already too powerful enough (gained role of world-class power by end of war).

__//unrestricted submarine warfare//__ : the sinking of ships with submarines without giving any warning to the ship; the ship is in the enemy territory __//total war//__ : a country that uses all of its resources for the war they are in __//rationing//__ : when the the government limits an amount of stock of a certain good because the country is short in them; this is usually when the country is in war __//propaganda//__ : a one-sided perspective on a certain cause to persuade people to think the opposing cause is wrong
 * Cornell Notes pg.417-422 **
 * New Definitions (Image Analysis in Pages File):

9.5/10

Section 3: 50
 * __The Crisis in the Balkans", pp 409-410, and "Europe Plunges into War", pp 411-415.__**

1st Comparison:
 * In the map of the European Alliances, the powers consist of central powers, allied powers, and neutral or unsigned countries. The cartoon calls the powers Darwinists, Clankers, and neutral countries. The map of the European Alliances shows the countries in color and it makes the gray (neutra)l countries seem as if they weren't worrying about anything. However, in the cartoon map, it shows the neutral countries almost as if ready to attack, but also weak. Also, the central powers are known as clankers, or a country making a lot of machinery. Furthermore, the countries on the outside of the Clankers or central powers are known as Darwinists or allied powers. The map shows that the central power is surrounded by the allied powers so in the cartoon map, it gives the Darwinists an attacking role. **

2nd Comparison: Why might Serbia have staked a claim to Bosnia and Herzegovina?
 * Austria wanted to keep Bosnia and Herzegovina and prevent Russia from further expansion. Austria was also trying to prevent Serbia from expanding and reaching the sea. The Serbians also believed the land was theres.**

Why might Russia have been interested in helping further that claim?
 * Serbia was Russia's ally at the time so Russia could have just wanted to help them. Furthermore, Russia probably helped Serbia to strengthen their alliance with them and get returning benefits.**

Why would Germany and Austria-Hungary have resisted any moves for Bosnian (used to mean Bosnia and Herzegovina) secession from Austria-Hungary? ** If Bosnian was removed from Austria-Hungary, Austria-Hungary would lose the land to the Serbians. Also, Germany is an ally of Austria-Hungary. Thus, they must help Austria-Hungary not have Bosnian removed. If the land were to go to the Serbians it might potentially make them stronger because of the extra piece of land that also provide resources. 10/10

__Impact of Nationalism__

 * Nationalism** has positive and negative implications (e.g. extremely strong nationalistic feelings sometimes lead a group to turn against outsiders). Using the table below, record the positive and negative impacts of Nationalism. Use page 254 of the textbook to help you.

//Positive and Negative Impacts of Nationalism// - Colonial rule got overthrown - The Democratic government was spread throughout the world - Scientific/Technological growth || - Minority cultures forced into combing into one nation majority culture - Ethnic Cleansing in 1990s - Nazism comes to rise as extreme nationalistic movements begin - Warfare from nations continuously fighting and competing || Do you think nationalism has had a more positive or negative impact on the world? Support your opinion with evidence. I believe nationalism had a more negative impact in this world. This is because with nationalism the people become more arrogant and they excluded others. It lead to wars and genocides within the world.
 * Positive Results || Negative Results ||
 * - Nation's people coming to together for the common good

__**Types of Nationalist Movements**__

We have looked at the rise of Nationalism and the positive and negative impacts that it has had on the modern world. Now, we are going to investigate the effects of nationalism on a region. The rise of nationalism tends to either unify or separate people.


 * [[image:http://timeline.phoenix.wikispaces.net/file/view/Types_of_Nationalist_Movements.jpg/193917634/526x257/Types_of_Nationalist_Movements.jpg caption="Types_of_Nationalist_Movements.jpg"]] ||
 * Types_of_Nationalist_Movements.jpg ||

//1. Using the table above, explain the characteristics of each type of Nationalistic movement in your own words.// //Unification: When two or more lands come together as one even though they were politically different.// //Separation: When a group does not want to be part of another state, so they resist from being added to another group. Another case is when the group tries to break away from another because of conflits from being so culturally different.// //State-building:// //2. What do you think would have happened to the empires (e.g. Austrian Empire, Ottoman Empire) during the rise of nationalism?// During the rise of nationalism, empires such as the Austrian Empire and Ottoman Empire must have received lots of rebellion. This is because the small parts of each empire found that other small countries revolted and were successful against their colonial leader. This could have lead to the breaking of these powerful empires.

__**CASE STUDY: Italy**__ Connect to[| online textbook]- pg 260 As we read about the unification of Italy, think about the role that nationalism plays in building a nation.

__**Key Skill: Analyzing Political Cartoons**__ Look at the cartoon on page 261 and complete the questions. 1. Italy as a country is depicted as a boot because of the strong similarities in looks they share. The picture is showing Italy as a whole by showing the boot nearly finishing. 2. Garibaldi is shown as a king and he seems to be greedy because of the clothes he wears. It seems as if he is craving for money as he wears the highest class of clothing. The clothing represents his love for money. 3. The title "Right Leg in the Boot at Last" means that there is finally one king for Italy's rule. The cartoonist seems to take this very positively because he uses the two words 'at last'. This means he was waiting for this very moment to happen.

__**CASE STUDY: Germany**__ On your own, read about the unification of Germany (online textbook pgs 261-263). 1) Create a flow chart that shows the key events that led the unification of Germany. 2) Looking at the map on page 263, answer the two geography skillbuilder questions. 1. Prussia is separated in two in 1865 and not connected. 2. 1871 seems to be the year in which the most territory was acquired. This is when Southern German states joined to form Germany.

3) Design a national symbol for the newly formed Germany. Include symbols that best represent the spirit or values of the German people at this time. Write a short paragraph explaining your symbol and its significance.

Reichsadler. That is the eagle back in the days that represented the German people. It was the Coat of Arms and it showed courage and strength. Also, the blood underneath the eagle shows the violence (battles) and hardships the German people had to go through to form their country. Behind all of this is the gold shield. This shield, which has a yellow background symbolized peace and unity within the country.

You have misinterpreted the cartoon -- Garibaldi is the kneeling figure. Why did the eagle "represent the German people"? You cannot use existing symbols when you are being asked to make up your own! 18/20

__HW 2/14__
Terms and Names: - Sepoys: Indian soldiers who were unhappy at their British rulers and thought that the British were violating their religious laws and customs. - Sepoy Mutiny: The rebellion of Sepoys throughout India. Sepoy regiments killed British women and children. - Congress Party: Members who gradually became more nationalistic - Mohandas K. Gandhi: Spread nationalism with the idea of non-violence. He played a major role in securing the independence for India. - Muhammad Ali Jinnah: Thought it would be better for everyone if the Muslims worked with Hindus to gain Indian nationalism.

**1. What were four factors that contributed to Britain's conquest of India?** The four factors that contributed to Britain’s conquest of India was because Britain’s military force was big, many Indian kingdoms were engaged in fierce power struggle, the British in India were well organized and united, unlike the Indians, and finally the British brought political stability, an efficient government and a system of law.

**2. What was the cause of the Sepoy Mutiny and what was its main result?** The reason the Sepoy Mutiny started was because educated Indians knew they were second class citizens in their own land, and that the top places of the Indian Civil Service were reserved for Britons only and much of the wealth for British India found its way into Britain’s wealth. Finally, they also feared that the British were violating their religious customs and beliefs. This all resulted in the direct rule by Britain.

**3. Which groups and ideas promoted the Indian independence?** Western education, the ideas of democracy and nationalism became present and they believed they should be able to have the same rights as the British. Equal rights were discussed in the meeting of the Indian National Congress and the Congress Party. The Muslim League and the Congress Party worked together to promote self government and independence.

The four general principles of Gandhi’s philosophy was one; live as simply as possible, never striving for material reward, two; be tolerant of the religious beliefs of others, three; devote one’s life to the service of others, three; battle injustice in all of its forms, but never by resorting to violence.
 * 4. What were the four general principles of Gandhi's philosophy?**

**5. What role did Jinnah play in the partition of India?** Jinnah tried to get the Muslim League and the Congress Party to come to a compromise. Eventually, they found out that separation was inevitable and they decided to split India.

**6. Which of the documents are pro-British in nature? Which ones are pro-Indian?** Pro-Indian: (A,D,F,G,H) Pro-British: (B,C,E,I,J,K)

**7. How would Indians in the lowest levels of their society benefit from India's Constitution as stated in Document H?** Indians in the lowest level could benefit from India’s Constitution because the state will not discriminate them base on their caste or social status.. Also it guaranteed them the ability to get employed or appointed to any office under the state. What the Constitution did for the lowest level of Indians was give them more chance and equality in India.

**8. Using only the information contained in the documents, answer the following question: How would British colonization have a lasting impact on the people of India? Use examples from the documents to support your answer.** British colonization surely did have a lasting impact on the people of India. As Sir Alfred Lyall observed he predicted the effects on Indian society. He saw that we changing the habits of our thoughts, religious ideas, and the moral level of the hole country. Also, the British have altered the Indian economy to suit their personal needs. An Indian peasant writes and says that their necessities of life were becoming an abundance to villagers. Life has been made harder for them because of the different laws, regulations, taxes and the increased revenue on land. Furthermore, Mahatma Gandhi came to a conclusion that the British made India more helpless than she ever was, politically and economically. At first, it was the Rowlatt Act and then it came to severe punishments.

**9. What were the causes of the cultural conflict between the British and the Indians?** The British thought of themselves better than the Indians. The British brought education, religion, and culture to India. However, the Indians did not want to get rid of their culture, so there is cultural separation within the British and the Indians.

**10. Identify both positive and negative effects of British Rule in India** Some positives for British ruling India was that it gave a democracy and it modernized the nation. Some negatives Britain gave to India was developing competing industries, so they would not have to compete. Finally, It kept them India dependent on Britain.

First off, the first principle makes us say that we should live our life out normally and not be interfered with the Europeans. Secondly, we should be nice to others even if they believe in another religion. Thirdly, we should help each other out (the Britons and Indians). Furthermore, even if you are being treated unequally, to not revolt and use violence to solve your problems.
 * 11. How were Gandhi's four general principles effective in dealing with a much more powerful Great Britain?**

Muslims wanted a separate nation from the Hindus or Congress Party rejected and did not work with them. The Muslims in India were worried that the Congress Party would only take the views of the Hindu majority. The conflict grew so large that eventually they ended up with a separate nation.
 * 12. For what reasons did Muslims demand a separate nation? **

The colony of India broke up into four separate nations because after Jinnah died, the military men seized power and created East Pakistan. They decided to call themselves Bangladesh and the Island Ceylon became Sri Lanka when they won independence.
 * 13. Why did the colony of India break up into four separate nations? **

20/20

__Reactions to Imperialism__
China: - China self-sufficient (opening trade difficult) - Opium from Great Britain to open trade - Tried to modernize -> many countries tried to take over -> U.S opens trade for all merchants so China wouldn't be taken over. - Boxer Rebellion: extraterrestrial rights

Japan: - U.S threatens Japan so Japan opens up trade - Mutsuhito new emperor - Modernization of Japan was attempted and accepted foreign items from other countries -> More power for Japan

United States of America: - Spanish American War occurs and America wins - Grows a pacific empire - U.S wanted to grow stronger and bigger - wanted to go to world markets - Wanted to educate/Christianize groups

2) Find one political cartoon for the impact of imperialism in China, one for the impact on Korea and one for American Imperialism. Include these cartoons in your notes and answers the following questions:

CHINA: 1) Is this image pro or anti imperialism? How do you know? This picture represents anti-imperialism, it shows other countries taking China getting China mad. 2) What views of the native peoples are being communicated in each of the illustrations? China is weak and can only watch other countries take its territory. 3) What views are being communicated about the Europeans/Japanese in their role as imperialists? The countries are selfishly taking the lands in China without even looking at China. 4) What is message is being conveyed by the author about the benefits __//**OR**//__ costs of imperialism? Imperialists are trying to take over the China's land without any permission.



1) Is this image pro or anti imperialism? How do you know?anti-imperialism. Three imperialist countries are trying to take over the weak one. 2) What views of the native peoples are being communicated in each of the illustrations? The native people are the fish and this means they are weak. 3) What views are being communicated about the Europeans/Japanese in their role as imperialists? Three strong countries are trying to catch the fish (native people). 4) What is message is being conveyed by the author about the benefits __//**OR**//__ costs of imperialism? Strong countries are trying to take resources of the weak countries and they cannot do anything to stop them.



1) Is this image pro or anti imperialism? How do you know? anti-imperialism. America pro-imperialism. America is protecting its allies. 2) What views of the native peoples are being communicated in each of the illustrations? Without the help of the mother country, the smaller countries are in danger from others. 3) What views are being communicated about the Europeans/Japanese in their role as imperialists? Well, the Americans here are thinking that they are the country that has to take care of everyone and they are taking their role with pride. 4) What is message is being conveyed by the author about the benefits __//**OR**//__ costs of imperialism? This image tells us that U.S played a big role as the mother country and they protected their allies.

1) Feudalism and mercantilism were two economic systems that preceded capitalism. Review and summarize (in your own words) how they generated wealth. How does capitalism DIFFER from these two systems? Feudalism grew wealth from large landowners providing protection and farmland to their tenants for taxes and labor. Mercantilism generated money from the amount of golds, silver, and tradable manufactured goods it controlled. Capitalism differs, or rather combines these two systems because it involves agriculture and trade.

2) According to this lecturer, what forces drive capitalism? Capitalism was driven by conquering the world. The motivation for conquering the world was the want for resources, labors and markets. So, the development of capitalism goes forward with the development of imperialism and colonialism.

Several of the cartoons are misinterpreted. Your definition of mercantilism does not differentiate it from capitalism, which also generates wealth from international trade! 14/20

__Discussion With Joseph Kim on Introduction to Imperialism__
Eric: Pink on black Joseph Black on grey

__Task 2: Scrambl__ __e for Africa__
Take a look at the map below! 1) Which countries controlled the largest sections of Africa in 1914? French and Britain controlled the largest sections of Africa in 1914.

2) Why do you think these countries had the largest area of Africa? These countries were able to stock up the largest area in Africa due to their power and quickness of getting to Africa. They were able to maintain all the lands that they had with their power.

= Task 3: = //Watch the video below and continue to add to your notes. Make sure that you include the long term impacts of Colonization as well.//

Began 1986 when first Northern Movement took arms in the Southern base. Deeper roots back to late 1800s (Scramble for Africa) - Colonization was motivated by the European hunger for African resources - Britain and France took large portion of Africa - Portuguese, Italians, Germans(committed first genocide of 20th century) took portions in Africa. - Milton Aboute (northerner) named first primed ministor -> 1971 Aboute overthrown by top military commander, Notorious Idi Amin with help of Israel and Britain - Amin overthrown 1979 -> Milton returned to power - President 1986 put isolated Acholi and took away everything they had - Alis Laquana started spiritual movement

= Task 4: = For more information read [|**European Imperialism in Africa (Overview)**] on ABC Clio (user id is **kis**, pw is **welcome**) and answer the questions below 1) What was the Berlin Conference? The Berlin Conference was a conference in Berlin in which the great European power plus the United States met up. There were no Africans in attendance and this was the first time in world history that one continent declared its plan to occupy and distribute the continent of another.

2) What were the three outcomes of the conference? 1) any sovereign power that wanted to claim any territory should inform the other powers "in order to . . . make good any claim of their own," 2) any such annexation should be validated by effective occupation 3) treaties with African rulers were to be considered a valid title to sovereignty.

= Task 5: = __**Key Skill: Analyzing Political Cartoons (ask the teacher for the handout)**__ Look through the 'Images of Imperialism' handout. For //__**each**__// of the images answer the following questions //__**using evidence from the image**__// to support your ideas.
 * //NOTE: You really need to analyze why an Artist has used certain images or words. Remember: a picture is worth a 1000 words!!!//**

1) Is this image pro or anti imperialism? How do you know? 2) What views of African and Asians are being communicated in each of the illustrations? 3) What views are being communicated about the British/ Americans in their role as imperialists? 4) What is message is being conveyed by the author about the benefits __//**OR**//__ costs of imperialism?

__Picture 1__ 1. This image is anti-imperialism because it shows a man selfishly going for the gold fields in Africa. 2. This image shows that Africa was powerless against the British/Americans. 3. British/American imperialists were selfish and only cared about the profit they were going to make in Africa with the gold fields. 4. Many people are trying to take Africa as their own and use it for their own personal needs.

__Picture 2__ 1. Pro-imperialism because he seems to be a rich man that is teaching the African kids into the light. 2. This image shows that Africans were very thankful of the man to teach them. 3. This image shows that they thought they were better than the Africans and that it was their duty to teach/educate them. 4. The Africans were able to learn and be educated because of imperialism.

__Picture 3__ 1. This image is anti-imperialism. It shows the imperialist snake taking over the African man in an evil way. 2. This image shows how much Africans were restricted and controlled. 3. This image shows that British imperialists were using the Africans for themselves in a very cruel and unpleasant manner. The snake represents Leopold, the King of Belgium. 4. Africans were weak and defenseless against the imperialists.

__Picture 4__ 1. This image is pro-imperialism. It shows the benefits of what Britain is giving to each of its colonies it was inhabiting. 2. The Africans seem to be very appreciative of this because they were protective, supplied them food and were also respectful and trustful. 3. They believe they were meant to do this as their duty and they have doing it in a very good manner. 4. Imperialism was also very beneficial to the countries that were being inhabited by the British and the Africans were also happy to have them there.

__Picture 5__ 1. This image is anti-imperialism. The African students at the front are being treated unequally to the white students in the back. The teacher is threatening the African students with a stick at the front and the white students are not in any danger from the teacher. 2. The Africans seem as if they do not want to be educated, so the teacher is punishing them and making them do it by force. There is a student behind the teacher that is washing the windows as punishment. 3. The teachers are not treating the students equally based on their race and they treat the black students particularly bad. This is depicting racism. 4. Education is being forced upon Africans and they are not willing to accept it, so it could lead to further problems in the future.

__Picture 6__ 1. This image represents anti-imperialism because the bird which represents imperialism is about to kill the Africans. 2. The Africans were always being watched upon and if they did something wrong they might have gotten killed. 3. The imperialists had full control over the Africans because their power was superior to theirs. 4. The imperialists were trying to use their power for themselves, for more land and wealth.

Picture 7 1. Represents anti-imperialism; Many are dying behind the scenes of which Europeans/Americans hide them and act as if nothing happened. 2. Imperialism lead to the many deaths of Philippines. 3. Imperialism only benefited Imperialists and it was to benefit their wealth and profit. 4. Imperialists did not care for the colonies they inhabited, but they solely did it for themselves.

You need to work on improving your analysis of political cartoons, putting more thought and effort into it, as these answers are quite superficial and many of the cartoons have been misinterpreted. 23/30


 * __ Age of Imperialism __**

Remember how I told you to label your pages documents with a UNIQUE name (eg. Eric's Age of Imperialism Table)?!

// Do Darwin’s theories apply to culture and society? Why or why not? Use the excerpts above and strong examples to support your points. // The two topics that Darwin covered about was the struggle for existence and natural selection. I believe that these do apply to culture and society. One reason being is because the strongest or fittest people always survive in our world and by this I do not mean physical strength, but by wealth and stature. Then with natural selection, the weak or the poor die off and the ones with power grow stronger and expand. With natural selection happening constantly, a more divergence in character becomes developed and this is where a culture can deprive from. Thus, creating a new society. Using the concepts of struggling for existence and natural selection that Darwin wrote, it shows us how the world's culture and society is evolving around us.
 * __ Darwin's Excerpts __**

Really? So people without wealth or stature do not/ ought not to survive? Is it really okay to say "the weak or the poor die off"? Hopefully afte the class discussion you understand better why Darwin's theories, which were used to JUSTIFY imperialism, are no longer considered valid when applied to society and culture. They do not fit with modern ideas of the equality of human dignity, and national sovereignty! 7.5/10

//What is “The White Man’s Burden” based on Rudyard Kipling’s description in this poem?// "The White Man's Burden" is based on Imperialism. It was the thoughts of western men that were against Imperialism. Also, they were using this world to imply that Americans/Europeans are the dominance of the world.
 * __ Imperialism __**

//Do you agree or disagree with Kipling’s characterization? Why or why not?// I agree with Kipling's characterization as they described all the things Imperialism was doing. It was disturbing the peace within countries. This was done by taking other countries by force and it created many violences. It would have been better to be content with the land you have then to seek another's land.

//What does this say about the attitude of Europeans and Americans toward the rest of the world during the mid 1800 - early 1900’s? Use specific examples from the poem.// The poem told me that Europeans and Americans were thinking they were better than everyone else in the world. This could be said with the fact that the poet wrote "The blame of those ye better."

//Is KIS an example of “The White Man’s Burden” in modern Korean society? Why or why not?// I do not see KIS being an example of "The White Man's Burden" in our modern Korean society. Our school is not trying to expand its school by force, but whether if they have the money or not from us. With the new facilities the school is giving us, they are trying to benefit us rather than use it for their personal needs..

You do not appear to have understood the first question, and have not explained what this "burden" is, so the answers to the other questions are incorrect. I hope you have a better understanding of the poem following the in-class explanation?

7/10

1. This could possibly be due to the fact that they're rich men with one of them being the manager of a textile factory. 2. I believe Mary Paul is very satisfied with her job at Lowell because the overseer could be very nice. This could relieve of all the pressures the average factory gave you back in those days. Also, when you have a nice boarding place, have enough to eat and have nice co-workers, it's very enjoyable to be at the job. 3. The picture says that the poor will die under Capitalism. However, if the country into a system based on socialism we would have more equality among the people and thus according to the picture, a better life.
 * __ Documented Based Questions __**

Your answers are too superficial. For example, for your answer to question #1, how does this account for their differing opinion? You have stated a fact (although both men were NOT rich -- managers are not capitalists, but bourgeousie) but not actually answered the question. For #2, you have not reconciled Mary Paul's rosy depiction of her job with what you know about poor working conditions in textile mills. Who is she writing to? Might she want to make things sound better than they actually are?

6.5/10

Where are your Cornell Notes pp 304-306, 308? 0/10 Would Marx have agree that these countries were "communist"? What has happened to the "communist" world (once called the "Second World", to distinguish it from the "First World" -- wealthy capitalist countries, and the "Third World" -- poor countries)? Why do you think this has happened? What do you think of the idea that the growing gap between the rich and poor in the industrialized world never materialized (see p. 270) because of the Union movement (the formation of trades unions who unite to demand better working conditions for workers) and reform laws (to improve conditions for workers, eg. safety requirements, limits on the length of the working day, minimum wages)? Post the answer to these 4 questions on your gallery page.
 * __ 1/31 __**

Marx would not have agreed that these countries were communist. I think this because these countries the government has too much power and it does not give their people freedom. Thus, not everyone is equal, since the government has the most money and power. This could also be why the communist countries today are so corrupt. This has happened because such countries like Russia and China implemented Marx's idea and changed it according to THEIR needs. Also, the idea that the growing gap between the rich and poor in the industrialized world never materializing because of the Union movement and reform laws is very helpful. This is because it could potentially stopped the need for communism for our country and keep our current system.

As I went over pages 65-72 about the Industrial Revolution I saw that the conditions for working in a factory was very harsh. Furthermore, since the workers were kids it was even a more cruel environment to work in. Seeing that kids my age or even younger working in factories that require hard labor is hard to imagine, and it leads to the fact that they lived short lives back in the Industrial Revolution. Also, the children back then seem to have grown up much faster and look more stern than the kids today. Even, the women or the girls seem to be working at extremely young ages with jobs that require meticulous work. All in all, the Industrial Revolution just seemed to be an almost forced labor job that gave kids minimum pay.
 * __ Photo Essay __**

The Industrial Revolution, and the urbanization that accompanied it, have been described as a mixed blessing. To what extent to you agree with this statement? My Answer: The Industrial Revolution was something that benefited us, but also harmed us in a way. The Industrial Revolution was a major change of ideas within the world and it was done without violence. Having the Industrial Revolution changed the way the society worked because master craftsman all lost their jobs to people who learned how to do one individual job for a certain product. However, because of this we are able to produce items in a large amounts at a time. Therefore with the large quantity of products, the prices dropped by a considerate amount. Also, the population increase was a major exponential growth and this could either be a good thing as it it means we are all getting healthier, or a bad thing because space on earth is only so limited. In conclusion, I completely agree with this statement.

__[|Eric Kwon - Mind Map of Invention]__ NEW: Mind Map of Invention:

__CLASS 45__ Napoleon's empire collapsed because he did not see an end of what he could do. He kept on getting into wars and battles with other countries and this created many enemies for him. With all these battles going on, he would have had to collect tax heavily from his country like King Louis XVI.
 * 4. Why did Napoleon's empire collapse?**

There were three major goals that the Congress of Vienna wanted to accomplish. 1) To establish balance of power 2) To prevent political Revolutions 3) Each nations had their own goals.
 * 5. What were the goals of the Congress of Vienna?**

// **Quote**: "We used to think that revolutions are the cause of change. Actually it is the other way around: change prepares the ground for revolution." // My reason for choosing this picture was because the paint represented the change of thinking, and that change in the society is preparing it for a new revolution.

__** Glog: Peter I The Great **__ __** [|Peter I The Great - Eric Kwon] **__

__** Absolutism **__ Questions:

1) What is absolutism? Absolutism is where a king would rule a certain state with absolute power. This would mean the state would be under a monarchy system, much like dictatorship today. One thing that comes under being a king under a rule with absolutism having to be under no law except the ones from God. Also, when a king has absolute power, he can create any law without being questioned. Another thing that a government under absolutism does is unify nation-states. With this, a king not being subjective to any laws except the ones under God, it means that he can nearly do anything he wants and not receive any punishments. Following through, being able to create any law without questioning can cause biased laws from the king and not have any other perspectives into it. Lastly, when a king unifies nation-states they are trying to get more power for themselves. Absolutism is a king’s way of saying that the closest thing to God.

2) Explain the justification for absolutism referred to as the 'divine right of kings'. The justification for absolutism referred to as the ‘divine right of kings’ says that the King had all powers, and was like God. Therefore, the king could not be chosen by people, but by God, and only God could change, or criticize the King.

3) List the causes of the rise of Absolutism in Europe.
 * ending of feudal partitioning
 * consolidation of power with the monarch
 * rise of state

4) Explain briefly how absolutism developed in The way Spain achieved absolutism through war and kings dominating their states for power.
 * //Spain//

Henry IV was the one who started absolutism in France, but Louis XIII was the one who made absolutism bigger and better.
 * //France//

Thomas Hobbes of England justified absolutism politically rather than religiously.
 * //England//

Russia achieved absolutism through the rule of Ivan the Terrible. When his wife died he became angry at his people and tried to came more power for himself and eventually made himself rule with absolutism.
 * //Russia//

__** Speed Dating Edward Gibbon **__

media type="youtube" key="owmGT81-psc" height="315" width="560"

__** Port 4 **__

APPARTS of Edicts for 1635 ordering the closing of Japan

Author : Tokugawa Shogunate Place and Time : Japan 1630s PriorKnowledge : Prior to this source I knew that Japan isolated themselves from the rest of the world. This prevented foreign trades for coming into their country. Audience : This source was written for the people living in Japan during that era. Reasons : This source was written to connect all the parts of the world. People from Japan had restrictions and people were not able to travel to other countries/regions. The Main Idea : The main idea of this was to help us understand that it took more than using military to gain more for the country. The country being a whole would have helped the country. Significance : This source is significant because it shows how much Tokugawa Leyasu was worried about. It showed that Japan was going through the darka ges. Also the visions of the country had was being smaller/narrower and gradually they closed the country for only themselves.

APPARTS Qianlong Author: Who created the source? What do you know about the author? What is the author’s point of view? Qianlong has created this source, and we know that he is the emperor of China and has kept China closed to many foreign traders. The author’s (Qialong) point of view was country based and not worldwide.

Place and Time: Where and when was the source produced? How might this affect the meaning of the source? This source was produced in 1791 in China. This could affect meaning of the source has it shows us a date when the closed period of China was occurring.

Prior Knowledge: Beyond information about the author and the context of its creation, what do you already know about the era/topic that would help you further understand the primary source? Beyond all this information from this source, I knew that China has a period of time for about 300 years where it was closed and did not let foreign traders in. Therefore, it lead to the Chinese to believe Europeans were still very lowly, while thinking they were still of higher class after 300 years.

Audience: For whom was the source created and how might this affect the reliability of the source? This source was created by the emperor of china, Qianlong and he wrote it to the king of England, King George III. This shows us that this source was the true feelings that Qianlong had for King George III and what he wanted to see from him.

Reason: Why was this source produced at the time it was first made? The source was produced so that Qianlong could tell King George III what he did not like about the trade King George III proposed. It was a “warning” for him to not do such thing again.

The Main Idea: What point is the source trying to convey? Qianlong has been isolated for so long that he does not know what is going on in this world. This leads him to believe that he is still of higher class than the Europeans. With this being in mind, he tells King George III he does not want his traders to come back or they will be killed.

Significance: Why is this source important? What inferences can you draw from this document? Ask yourself, “So what?” in relation to the question asked. This source is important because it showed us the isolation and closed country China had when Qianlong was in rule. China was very arrogant to England and it makes me wonder what’s going to happen to China. But since the military in England is much better, I believe they will call for war against China, unless they do everything they want for them later on.

**1) Who was "the Bald Rat"?** Toyotomi Hideyoshi was nicknamed “the Bald Rat”. He had a dream to dominate the world and had a broad mind to think of wild possibilities.

**2. Where did Japan hope to build its empire?** Japan hoped to build its empire from China. However, there was no efficient route that went to China. What they did was try and invade Korea, because it is a bridge to China. They thought that taking Korea, it would be easy for them to invade China and take their land.

**3. What stopped it from building its empire as planned?** Japan’s empire was not built as planned because Toyotomi Hideyoshi was not thinking as widely before. When Japan was defeated by Korea, the Japanese gave up. Then he started to care about only his son Hideyori. However, Hideyori was not Hideyoshi’s son of his legal wife. When Hideyoshi died however, the generals did not follow Hideyori and he committed suicide. From here Japan was a closed country and did let any new ideas come in from other countries.

**4. Why didn't they try again?** Japan didn’t try again because there to many duties to take care of in their own country. When Hideyoshi, generals tried to get more power for themselves by splitting up and fighting with each other. When this was happening, Japan did not care about what was happening outside because there was so much happening. They isolated themselves from the world and took care of business in their own country.

I see..I think...I wonder:
I see...a man looking towards the gods and the spirits. I think...the man had died and is now going towards the heavens. I wonder...why the man has to be naked while immortalizing. I see...two hands connected as if they’re bonding with each other. I think...the two hands have never seen each other before and are connecting for the first time. I wonder...why two hands are connecting with their fingers.

__Class 11 Picture Reflections__
In 1421, China launched a fleet of over 800 ships of various sizes and carried more than 30,000 men. The fleet included over 300 leviathan "treasure ships," which were 480 ft long and 180 ft wide. Compare with the Santa Maria (Columbus' vessel), which was 150 ft long and a mere 20 ft wide.

[[image:http://boylehist9.phoenix.wikispaces.net/file/view/europe_1400.jpg width="450" height="478" caption="europe_1400.jpg"]]
Europe in 1400

====

====

__The spread of Islam__
Umayyad was a large territory with the Islamic faith and was later turned into the Abbasid Empire in 750-1258. Later on the Empire was split into separate territories and the Islamic faith was and knowledge was within those territories. = = = __Family History Project__ = Event that I picked: In August 2010 I had moved from New Jersey to South Korea with my parents and this was a significant change for my family. I would have to be adjusting to a new environment and culture after living in New Jersey all my life. However, I had somewhat of a familiar understanding of how I had to live in Korea as I visited here several times. But, my mom loved the American life and wants to go back. Currently, we have lived here for about a year and our family has adjusted very well. Even so, through this project I had learned that my mom truly misses her friends/family in America and has a nudge for her to go back there every so often.

Source 1: **Unwritten** (//Primary//) This is my mom with my dad a couple months after residing in Korea. They were currently in Jeju for vacation in this picture. This picture proves that my mom went to Korea and is living here.

Source 2: **Written** (//Primary)// This card was issued to my mom on August 18, 2010. This is a card that gave my mom permission to reside in Korea. Something that this proves is that my mom lived in Korea recently.

Source 3**: Interview - Mom (**//Primary//**)** media type="file" key="Coming back to home country.mov" width="59" height="59" media type="file" key="Miss living in America" width="58" height="58" media type="file" key="What makes you want to go back.mov" width="59" height="59" media type="file" key="Happier life in korea.mov" width="59" height="59"
 * Me : After coming back to your home country, how has life been for you?**
 * __//Mom//__ :** At first when I came to Korea I was very lonely and bored. I also had a culture shock and some of the people were weird to me. And because I didn't know the things around me that well, I couldn't adjust very well and it was very tiring. Finally, because I didn't know how to drive well in Korea it was very uncomfortable for me.
 * Me : Do you miss living in America?**
 * __//Mom//__ :** Yes, I miss America a lot.
 * Me : What makes you want to go back there?**
 * __//Mom//__ :** In America my whole family is there and I could play my sports whenever I want. Also, I could eat my favorite food there and travel to many different places. I thought that America had many great things there.
 * Me : What do you think will make you live a happier life in Korea?**
 * __//Mom//__ :** If I go to places like the culture center I could learn many different things and live a busy life. Also, while I live in Korea, I could travel to many different places and eat a lot of delicious food like I did in America. Finally, I could make new friends and live a significant life I think I could live a happier life here.

Turning Points in Pre-Renaissance Eric and Joseph Class 7

Post most recent work at the top of the page, please! Use the blue bar button on the edit toolbar to make a line between assignments.